Pietro Previtali, Filippo Giorgini, Randall Mullen, Nick K. Dookozlian, Kerry L. Wilkinson, Christopher M. For. A systematic review and meta-analysis of vineyard techniques used to delay ripening.. 2021. agriXiv.2021.00112
DOI：10.31220/agriRxiv.2021.00112
声明：预印本系统所发表的论文仅用于最新科研成果的交流与共享，未经同行评议，因此不建议直接应用于指导生产实验。
A systematic review and meta-analysis of vineyard techniques used to delay ripening.
-
Abstract: Abstract Several vineyard techniques have been proposed to delay grape maturity in light of the advanced maturation driven by increasingly frequent water and heat stress events that are detrimental to grape quality. These studies differ in terms of their experimental conditions, and in the present work we have attempted to summarize previous observations in a quantitative, data-driven systematic review. A meta-analysis of quantitative data gathered across 43 relevant studies revealed the overall significance of the proposed treatments and evaluated the impact of different experimental conditions on the outcome of antitranspirants, delayed pruning and late source limitation. Antitranspirants were most effective when applied twice and closer to veraison, while di-1- p -menthene increased the ripening delay by about 1°Brix compared to kaolin. Larger ripening delays were achieved with delayed pruning of low-yielding vines or by pruning at later stages of apical bud development. Late defoliation or shoot trimming delayed ripening in high-yielding vines and represent suitable solutions for late-harvested varieties, but became ineffective where the treatment decreased yield. This quantitative meta-analysis of 242 primary observations uncovers factors affecting the efficacy of vineyard practices to delay ripening, which should be carefully considered by grape growers attempting to achieve this outcome.
Key words: pruning; late; delay; vineyard; quantitative; delaye提交时间：2021-01-01
版权声明：作者本人独立拥有该论文的版权，预印本系统仅拥有论文的永久保存权利。任何人未经允许不得重复使用。 -
图表
-
Ilce Gabriela Medina-Meza, Joshua VanderWeide, Cristóbal Torres-Palacios, Paolo Sabbatin. Quantitative metabolomics unveils the impact of agricultural practices in grape metabolome.. 2021. doi: 10.31220/agriRxiv.2021.00029
Paul Melloy, Emerson M. Del Ponte, Adam H. Spark. Timing of triazole-based spray schedules for controlling mungbean powdery mildew in Australia: a meta-analysis.. 2021. doi: 10.31220/agriRxiv.2021.00042
Moritz Laub, Lisa Pataczek, Arndt Feuerbacher, Sabine Zikeli, Petra Hög. Contrasting yield responses at varying levels of shade suggest different suitability of crops for dual land-use systems. A meta-analysis.. 2021. doi: 10.31220/agriRxiv.2021.00099
Saeed Nosratabadi, Nesrine Khazami, Marwa Ben Abdallah, Zoltan Lackner, Shahab S. Band, Amir Mosavi, Csaba Mak. Social capital contributions to food security: a comprehensive literature review.. 2020. doi: 10.31220/agriRxiv.2020.00021
Gonzalo Cantalapiedra-Hijar, I. Morel, Bernard Sepchat, Céline Chantelauze, G A Miller, Carol-Anne Duthie, I. Ortigues-Marty, R.J. Dewhurs. Identifying cattle with superior growth feed efficiency through their natural 15 N abundance and plasma urea concentration: a meta-analysis.. 2021. doi: 10.31220/agriRxiv.2021.00107
Santosh Kalaun. Correlation and path coefficient analysis of seed yield and yield components of French bean ( Phaseolus vulgaris L.) genotypes in sub-tropical region.. 2020. doi: 10.31220/agriRxiv.2020.00001
Aida Safina Aridi, Ling ChinNyuk, Nur Akmal Ishak, M. Y. Nor Nadiah, Mohammad Faisal Ahmed, Yus Aniza Yuso. Structural FTIR analysis of cellulose functional groups isolated from Leucaena leucocephala pods using different bleaching agents.. 2020. doi: 10.31220/agriRxiv.2020.00026
M. C. Onyema, Chukwudi C. Nwaigw. Urban agriculture: a timely game changer for urban residents in Nigeria.. 2020. doi: 10.31220/agriRxiv.2020.00016
Willis Ochilo, G. Nyamasyo, J. Agan. Within-plant distribution and binomial sequential sampling plan for Tetranychus evansi (Acari: Tetranychidae) in greenhouse tomato: implications for management.. 2020. doi: 10.31220/agriRxiv.2020.00011
Eduardo Santos Rodrigues, Gabriel Sgarbiero Montanha, Marcos Henrique Feresin Gomes, Nádia Marion Duran, Camila Graziele Corrêa, Sara Luiza Zachi Romeu, Anderson do Espírito Santo Pereira, Jhones Luiz de Oliveira, Eduardo de Almeida, Alejandro Pérez‐de‐Luque, Subhasis Ghoshal, Catherine Santaella, Renata de Lima, Leonardo Fernandes Fraceto, Hudson Wallace Pereira de Carvalh. Are nanomaterials leading to more efficient agriculture? Outputs from 2009-2022 research metadata analysis.. 2021. doi: 10.31220/agriRxiv.2021.00054
-
序号 提交日期 编号 操作 1 2021-01-01 10.31220/agriRxiv.2021.00112V1
下载 -
-
公开评论 匿名评论 仅发给作者
引用格式
访问统计
- 阅读量：50
- 下载量： 0
- 评论数：0
