DOI：10.31220/agriRxiv.2020.00011

Within-plant distribution and binomial sequential sampling plan for Tetranychus evansi (Acari: Tetranychidae) in greenhouse tomato: implications for management.

•  

  Abstract: Abstract The red spider mite, Tetranychus evansi is a critical pest of tomato in the tropics. Control of T. evansi has traditionally depended on acaricide treatments. However, it is only in a handful of crops where monitoring techniques for mites, using statistical methods, have been developed to help farmers decide when to spray. The objective of this study, therefore, was to develop a sampling plan that would help farmers increase accuracy, and reduce the labor and time needed to monitor T. evansi on tomato. The distribution of T. evansi within-plant was aggregated, and intermediate leaves (YFL) was the most appropriate sampling unit to evaluate the mite density. Analysis based on Taylor's Power Law showed an aggregated pattern of distribution of T. evansi , while assessment of the fitness of the binomial model indicated that a tally threshold of 5 mites per YFL provided the best fit. Consequently, binomial sequential sampling plans premised on three action thresholds (0.1, 0.2 and 0.3) were developed. The binomial sequential sampling plan for T. evansi developed in this study has the potential to significantly increase the chance for targeted acaricide applications. This judicious use of pesticides is especially crucial within the context of integrated pest management (IPM).

  Key words: t. evansi; binomial; sequential sampling plan; developed; aggregated; mite

  提交时间：2020-01-01

  版权声明：作者本人独立拥有该论文的版权，预印本系统仅拥有论文的永久保存权利。任何人未经允许不得重复使用。
• html

• 图表

• María‐Soledad Benítez, Patrick M. Ewing, Shannon L. Osborne, R. Michael Lehma. Rhizosphere microbial communities explain positive effects of diverse crop rotations on corn and soybean performance: microbiome explain benefits of diverse rotations.. 2020. doi: 10.31220/agriRxiv.2020.00023

  Suvita Rani, Shubham Singh, Sujit Bhattachary. What is the impact of India's plant variety protection act? An analytical examination based on registrations under this act.. 2020. doi: 10.31220/agriRxiv.2020.00004

  Marino Villavicencio, L. Schuller, Francisco Espinosa, Carlos Noceda, Daynet Sosa, Simón Pérez-Martíne. Foliar endophytic fungi of Theobroma cacao stimulate more than inhibit Moniliophthora spp. growth and behave more as an endophytes than pathogens.. 2020. doi: 10.31220/agriRxiv.2020.00019

  Santosh Kalaun. Correlation and path coefficient analysis of seed yield and yield components of French bean ( Phaseolus vulgaris L.) genotypes in sub-tropical region.. 2020. doi: 10.31220/agriRxiv.2020.00001

  Misterbino Borgès Garcìa, Yoenia Sánchez Rodríguez, Diana María Reyes Avalo. Respuesta de tubérculos comerciales de ?ame ( Dioscorea spp.) en el momento de la cosecha y almacenamiento poscosecha.. 2020. doi: 10.31220/agriRxiv.2020.00005

  Todd S. Rosenstock, M. Mayzelle, Nictor Namoi, Peter Fantk. Climate impacts of natural farming: A cradle to gate comparison between conventional practice and Andhra Pradesh Community Natural Farming.. 2020. doi: 10.31220/agriRxiv.2020.00013

  M. Abdullah Shaikh, Michalis Hadjikakou, Brett A. Brya. Patterns and trends in national-level consumption and production-based utilisation of the land-system change planetary boundary.. 2020. doi: 10.31220/agriRxiv.2020.00002

  Miranda Bane, Michael J. O. Pocock, Caroline Gibert, Matthieu Forster, Geoffroy Oudoire, Stéphane A. P. Derocles, David Boha. Farmer flexibility concerning future rotation planning is affected by the framing of climate predictions.. 2020. doi: 10.31220/agriRxiv.2020.00025

  Inderpreet Dhaliwal, Gaurav Khosla, T. P. Singh, B. S. Gill, Prashant Kaushi. DUS characterization of some released varieties and advanced breeding lines of soybean ( Glycine max L.) under Punjab agroclimatic conditions.. 2020. doi: 10.31220/agriRxiv.2020.00015

  K. V. Daniel, Mark A. Bradford, Emma Fuller, Emily E. Oldfield, Stephen A. Woo. Soil organic matter effects on US maize production and crop insurance payouts under drought.. 2020. doi: 10.31220/agriRxiv.2020.00018

• 序号	提交日期	编号	操作
  1	2020-01-01	10.31220/agriRxiv.2020.00011V1	下载

• 公开评论  匿名评论  仅发给作者 提交评论