农业科技论文预印本发布平台

快速首发

即时共享

开放交流

高效传播

高级检索+

 

DOI:10.31220/agriRxiv.2021.00107
声明:预印本系统所发表的论文仅用于最新科研成果的交流与共享,未经同行评议,因此不建议直接应用于指导生产实验。

Identifying cattle with superior growth feed efficiency through their natural 15 N abundance and plasma urea concentration: a meta-analysis.

  •  

    Abstract: Abstract The objective of this study was to test two candidate biomarkers of feed efficiency in growing cattle. A database was built using performance data from 13 trials conducted with growing heifers, steers and young bulls and testing 34 dietary treatments. The database included 769 individual records for animal performance and laboratory data for N isotopic discrimination measured in plasma or muscle (Δ 15 N animal-diet ; n = 749) and plasma urea concentration (n = 659). Feed conversion efficiency (FCE) and residual feed intake (RFI) criteria were calculated for a duration ranging between 56 and 259 d, depending on the trial. For FCE prediction, mixed models included the random effects of study, diet within-study and pen within-study (i.e. contemporary group; CG) allowing these effects to be progressively excluded from the relationship. For RFI prediction, simple linear regressions were tested with the CG effect removed from biomarker values before analysis. Better models were obtained with Δ 15 N animal-diet compared to plasma urea concentration, irrespective of using mean or individual values and regardless of the feed efficiency criterion. Prediction error (0.027 kg/kg) from mixed-effect models using mean FCE and Δ 15 N animal-diet values would allow discrimination of 2 dietary treatments or production conditions in terms of FCE if they differ by more than 0.10 kg/kg. The Δ 15 N animal-diet values showed a negative and significant (P<0.001) relationship with FCE at the individual level and results highlighted that it is possible to significantly discriminate two animals randomly selected from the same CG if they differ by at least 0.06 kg/kg FCE. In addition, the top 20% highest and lowest animals within-CG in terms of RFI and FCE (extreme animals) showed significant (P<0.001) differences in Δ 15 N animal-diet values, while only extreme FCE animals could be discriminated when using plasma urea concentrations (P=0.002). No gain in feed efficiency prediction was observed when combining candidate biomarkers. However for FCE, when average daily gain data was combined with Δ 15 N animal-diet , the prediction at the individual level was strengthened compared to using only single predictors. Our findings confirm that Δ 15 N animal-diet may be useful to form groups of animals for precision feeding. Further studies are warranted, however, to evaluate the usefulness of this promising biomarker for genetic selection.

    Key words: fce; diet; animal; 15 n; animals; c

    提交时间:2021-01-01

    版权声明:作者本人独立拥有该论文的版权,预印本系统仅拥有论文的永久保存权利。任何人未经允许不得重复使用。
  • 图表

  • Guoxian Liang, Lufeng Zhao, Junlong Ye, Zijun Ji, Jianjun Tang, Ke-yu Bai, Si-Jun Zheng, Liangliang Hu, Xin Che. Using aquatic animals as partners to increase yield and soil nitrogen in the paddy ecosystem.. 2021. doi: 10.31220/agriRxiv.2021.00086

    Paul Melloy, Emerson M. Del Ponte, Adam H. Spark. Timing of triazole-based spray schedules for controlling mungbean powdery mildew in Australia: a meta-analysis.. 2021. doi: 10.31220/agriRxiv.2021.00042

    Moritz Laub, Lisa Pataczek, Arndt Feuerbacher, Sabine Zikeli, Petra Hög. Contrasting yield responses at varying levels of shade suggest different suitability of crops for dual land-use systems. A meta-analysis.. 2021. doi: 10.31220/agriRxiv.2021.00099

    Claudia Arndt, A.N. Hristov, William J. Price, Shelby C. McClelland, A.M. Pelaez, S.F. Cueva, J. Oh, A. Bannink, Ali Bayat, L.A. Crompton, J. Dijkstra, Maguy Eugène, E. Kebreab, M. Kreuzer, M. McGee, Christian Martin, C. J. Newbold, Christopher K. Reynolds, Angela Schwarm, Kevin J. Shingfield, Jolien B. Veneman, D. R. Yáñez-Ruíz, Zeren Y. Strategies to mitigate enteric methane emissions by ruminants - a way to approach the 2.0°C target.. 2021. doi: 10.31220/agriRxiv.2021.00040

    Ipsheta Bose, Tamilvanan Shunmugaperumal, Rahul Singh, Jai Sunder, Gayatri Samadda. Preliminary study on exploration of seaweed for an alternative to antibiotic growth promoter in poultry feed additives.. 2021. doi: 10.31220/agriRxiv.2021.00079

    N.Z. Stancheva, J. Nakev, Desislava Vlahova‐Vangelova, Desislav Balev, Stefan Dragoe. Impact of Siberian larch dihydroquercetin or dry distilled rose petals as feed supplements on 8 lamb's growth performance, carcass characteristics and blood count parameters.. 2020. doi: 10.31220/agriRxiv.2020.00006

    Desislava Vlahova‐Vangelova, Desislav Balev, Nikolay Kolev, Teodora Popova, Stefan Dragoe. Quality changes of frozen Longissimus dorsi and Semimembranosus muscles and perirenal adipose tissue during storage in lambs fed dihydroquercetin or dry distilled rose petals supplemented diet.. 2021. doi: 10.31220/agriRxiv.2021.00034

    Marino Villavicencio, L. Schuller, Francisco Espinosa, Carlos Noceda, Daynet Sosa, Simón Pérez-Martíne. Foliar endophytic fungi of Theobroma cacao stimulate more than inhibit Moniliophthora spp. growth and behave more as an endophytes than pathogens.. 2020. doi: 10.31220/agriRxiv.2020.00019

    Pietro Previtali, Filippo Giorgini, Randall Mullen, Nick K. Dookozlian, Kerry L. Wilkinson, Christopher M. For. A systematic review and meta-analysis of vineyard techniques used to delay ripening.. 2021. doi: 10.31220/agriRxiv.2021.00112

    Todd S. Rosenstock, M. Mayzelle, Nictor Namoi, Peter Fantk. Climate impacts of natural farming: A cradle to gate comparison between conventional practice and Andhra Pradesh Community Natural Farming.. 2020. doi: 10.31220/agriRxiv.2020.00013

  • 序号 提交日期 编号 操作
    1 2021-01-01

    10.31220/agriRxiv.2021.00107V1

    下载
  • 公开评论  匿名评论  仅发给作者

引用格式

Gonzalo Cantalapiedra-Hijar, I. Morel, Bernard Sepchat, Céline Chantelauze, G A Miller, Carol-Anne Duthie, I. Ortigues-Marty, R.J. Dewhurs. Identifying cattle with superior growth feed efficiency through their natural 15 N abundance and plasma urea concentration: a meta-analysis.. 2021. agriXiv.2021.00107

访问统计

  • 阅读量:62
  • 下载量: 0
  • 评论数:0

Email This Article

User name:
Email:*请输入正确邮箱
Code:*验证码错误