Simon Fonteyne, José Carlos Cruz, Avelino Espinosa Solorio, Nora Honsdorf, Abel Saldivia Tejeda, Ouorou Ganni Mariel Guera, Nele Verhuls. Does residue cover lead to greater frost damage in barley under conservation agriculture?. 2023. agriXiv.2023.00211
Does residue cover lead to greater frost damage in barley under conservation agriculture?
DOI: 10.31220/agriRxiv.2023.00211
-
Abstract: Abstract Farmers reported increased frost damage in barley ( Hordeum vulgare ) sown in conservation agriculture in the Mexican Bajío region during the autumn-winter season. To determine whether this effect is real and whether it reduced crop yield under conservation agriculture, we performed two field experiments and gathered observational data from other experiments and farmers' fields. Although more frost damage can sometimes indeed be observed in wheat and barley sown in permanent beds with stubble cover, the data indicate that the plants recover from this damage and that it does not affect yield. Frost damage should not be considered an impediment to adoption of conservation agriculture in the crops grown in the autumn-winter season in the Mexican Bajío.
Key words: conservation agriculture; frost damage; sown; winter season; baj; mexicaSubmit time: 9 November 2023
Copyright: The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted agriXiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. -
图表
-
Viviane Costa Silva, Mateus Silva Rocha, Gláucia Amorim Faria, Sílvio Fernando Alves Xavier, Tiago Almeida de Oliveira, Ana Patrícia Bastos Peixot. Boosting algorithms for prediction in agriculture: an application of feature importance and feature selection boosting algorithms for prediction crop damage.. 2021. doi: 10.31220/agriRxiv.2021.00092
Rohit Raj Jha, Gopal Prasad Khanal, Kavita Isvara. Factors affecting crop field use by Blackbuck in Krishnasaar Conservation Area, Nepal.. 2021. doi: 10.31220/agriRxiv.2021.00098
Erich,Seamon, Paul E.,Gessler, John T.,Abatzoglou, Philip W.,Mote, Stephen S.,Le. Climatic damage cause variations of agricultural insurance loss for the Pacific Northwest region of the United States.. 2023. doi: 10.31220/agriRxiv.2023.00209
Javier Ordóñez, Angelos Alexopoulos, Κωνσταντίνος Κούτρας, Αθανάσιος Καλογεράς, Kyriakos Stefanidis, Vanessa Marto. Blockchain in agriculture: a PESTELS analysis.. 2023. doi: 10.31220/agriRxiv.2023.00199
M. C. Onyema, Chukwudi C. Nwaigw. Urban agriculture: a timely game changer for urban residents in Nigeria.. 2020. doi: 10.31220/agriRxiv.2020.00016
Ana Menénde. Argentine scientific development of Agriculture 4.0. State of the art.. 2022. doi: 10.31220/agriRxiv.2022.00159
Naim Edwards, Nicholas Medina, Elizabeth Aske. Mixing cover crops suppresses weeds and roto-till improves urban soil compaction and infiltration.. 2022. doi: 10.31220/agriRxiv.2022.00149
Bryan C. Runck, Adam Streed, Diane Wang, Patrick M. Ewing, Michael B. Kantar, Barath Raghava. State spaces for agriculture: a metasystematic design automation framework.. 2022. doi: 10.31220/agriRxiv.2022.00158
Sebastián Varela, Andrew D. B. Leake. Implementing spatio-temporal 3D-convolution neural networks and UAV time series imagery to better predict lodging damage in sorghum.. 2022. doi: 10.31220/agriRxiv.2022.00120
C. A. Rose Mary, A. Raji Sukumar, N. Hemalath. Text based smart answering system in agriculture using RNN.. 2021. doi: 10.31220/agriRxiv.2021.00071
-
ID Submit time Number Download -
Public Anonymous To author only
Get Citation
Article Metrics
- Read: 56
- Download: 0
- Comment: 0



