DOI: 10.31220/agriRxiv.2023.00199

•  

  Abstract: Abstract Blockchain (BC) represents a disruptive technology that has been extensively used to ensure immutability of digital transactions. Starting as an underlying mechanism in the digital currency sector, it has been applicable in a wide range of sectors and application domains. Agricultural sector represents a sector of significance for overall sustainability challenges that is benefiting from digitalization and technological evolution and the enforcement of Industry 4.0 paradigm shift towards precision agriculture. Introduction of Internet of Things, and Cyber-Physical Systems increase overall complexity, with Big Data analysis and Machine Learning technologies providing innovative applications. BC appears to be a promising technology for agriculture providing mechanisms for tracing of products and overall agricultural supply chain (SC) management from the farm to the fork. Authors investigate the challenges and open issues for the application of BC in agriculture performing a state of the art analysis along the PESTELS framework. A large number of challenges including technological ones, creates big research potential for the evolution of the area.

  Key words: agriculture; sector; analysis; bc; providing; pestel

  Submit time: 1 January 2023

  Copyright: The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted agriXiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.
• html

• 图表

• Eduardo Santos Rodrigues, Gabriel Sgarbiero Montanha, Marcos Henrique Feresin Gomes, Nádia Marion Duran, Camila Graziele Corrêa, Sara Luiza Zachi Romeu, Anderson do Espírito Santo Pereira, Jhones Luiz de Oliveira, Eduardo de Almeida, Alejandro Pérez‐de‐Luque, Subhasis Ghoshal, Catherine Santaella, Renata de Lima, Leonardo Fernandes Fraceto, Hudson Wallace Pereira de Carvalh. Are nanomaterials leading to more efficient agriculture? Outputs from 2009-2022 research metadata analysis.. 2021. doi: 10.31220/agriRxiv.2021.00054

  Bryan C. Runck, Adam Streed, Diane Wang, Patrick M. Ewing, Michael B. Kantar, Barath Raghava. State spaces for agriculture: a metasystematic design automation framework.. 2022. doi: 10.31220/agriRxiv.2022.00158

  C. A. Rose Mary, A. Raji Sukumar, N. Hemalath. Text based smart answering system in agriculture using RNN.. 2021. doi: 10.31220/agriRxiv.2021.00071

  Hirokazu Komatsu, Jeremy Rappley. Resolving inconsistencies in environmental impact assessments of organic farming: a comparison of two meta-analyses.. 2023. doi: 10.31220/agriRxiv.2023.00216

  Ana Menénde. Argentine scientific development of Agriculture 4.0. State of the art.. 2022. doi: 10.31220/agriRxiv.2022.00159

  Chauncy Fan. Research trend of antimicrobial resistance in livestock farm of China in 21 century: a bibliometric analysis.. 2021. doi: 10.31220/agriRxiv.2021.00056

  Bryony Taylor, Jonathan D. Casey, Belinda Luke, Tim Beale, Joe Beeken, Steve Edgington, Rhian Whelan, Julien Godwi. EO4AgroClimate: improving modelling of pests and biological control agents to adapt to changing climates.. 2023. doi: 10.31220/agriRxiv.2023.00179

  M. C. Onyema, Chukwudi C. Nwaigw. Urban agriculture: a timely game changer for urban residents in Nigeria.. 2020. doi: 10.31220/agriRxiv.2020.00016

  Lucius Tamm, Barbara Thuerig, Stoilko Apostolov, Hugh Blogg, Esmeralda Borgo, Paola E. Corneo, Susanne Fittje, Michelangelo de Palma, Ádám Donkó, Catherine Experton, E. Marin, Ángela Morell Pérez, I. Pertot, Anton M. H. Rasmussen, Håvard Steinshamn, Airi Vetemaa, Helga Willer, Joëlle Herforth-Rahm. Copper use in organic agriculture in twelve European countries.. 2021. doi: 10.31220/agriRxiv.2021.00108

  Aye Nyein Chan, Miao Lin Pay, Jesper Christensen, Fei He, Laura C. Roden, Hafiz Ahmed, Mathias Fo. Red, blue or mix: choice of optimal light qualities for enhanced plant growth through in silico analysis.. 2023. doi: 10.31220/agriRxiv.2023.00197

• ID

  Submit time

  Number

  Download

• Public  Anonymous  To author only Submit Comments