Naim Edwards, Nicholas Medina, Elizabeth Aske. Mixing cover crops suppresses weeds and roto-till improves urban soil compaction and infiltration.. 2022. agriXiv.2022.00149
Mixing cover crops suppresses weeds and roto-till improves urban soil compaction and infiltration.
DOI: 10.31220/agriRxiv.2022.00149
-
Abstract: Abstract Urban soils have been degraded by decades of industrial activities, but they also represent opportunities to improve food sovereignty for urban residents practicing urban agriculture. Urban growers often use varying practices of compost, tillage, and cover cropping, yet further integrated approaches could facilitated by model analyses of how different practices may compare or complement each other. This study examined how tillage methods representing various intensities and cover crop mixes targeting different functions affected agricultural variables including soil compaction, water infiltration rate, herbaceous weedy plant pressure, and crop yield. Results showed that both roto- and tractor-till significantly affected compaction but not yield compared to no-till, and roto-till also improved infiltration, while tractor-till reached deeper soils but allowed denser weed growth. Mixing sorghum-sudangrass, buckwheat, and cowpea cover crops significantly reduced weed pressure compared to other mixtures, and perennials affected compaction but not soil water infiltration under no-till. These results reveal that medium-intensity tillage may offer more balanced trade-offs for initial management, and that cover crops can help reduce weeds under low-till strategies. Overall this study offers evidence detailing effects of various tillage and cover crop styles that can be of use for smallholder urban growers.
Key words: till; tillage; roto; cover crops; compaction; mixinSubmit time: 1 January 2022
Copyright: The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted agriXiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. -
图表
-
Bibiana Betancur‐Corredor, Birgit Lang, David J. Russel. Reducing tillage intensity benefits the soil micro- and mesofauna in a global meta-analysis.. 2022. doi: 10.31220/agriRxiv.2022.00146
Moritz Laub, Lisa Pataczek, Arndt Feuerbacher, Sabine Zikeli, Petra Hög. Contrasting yield responses at varying levels of shade suggest different suitability of crops for dual land-use systems. A meta-analysis.. 2021. doi: 10.31220/agriRxiv.2021.00099
M. C. Onyema, Chukwudi C. Nwaigw. Urban agriculture: a timely game changer for urban residents in Nigeria.. 2020. doi: 10.31220/agriRxiv.2020.00016
Richa Rajput, A. Arunachala. Plant residue quality index and ecological potential approach for selective reincorporation of crop residues in soil.. 2022. doi: 10.31220/agriRxiv.2022.00122
K. V. Daniel, Mark A. Bradford, Emma Fuller, Emily E. Oldfield, Stephen A. Woo. Soil organic matter effects on US maize production and crop insurance payouts under drought.. 2020. doi: 10.31220/agriRxiv.2020.00018
Tarun Kumar, K. K. Bhardwaj, Prashant Kaushi. Effect of soil properties and nutrient status on Eucalyptus tereticornis based agroforestry system in India.. 2020. doi: 10.31220/agriRxiv.2020.00008
Quentin Struelens, Diego Mina, Olivier Dangle. Combined effects of landscape composition and pesticide use on herbivore and pollinator functions in smallholder farms.. 2020. doi: 10.31220/agriRxiv.2020.00017
Miranda Bane, Michael J. O. Pocock, Caroline Gibert, Matthieu Forster, Geoffroy Oudoire, Stéphane A. P. Derocles, David Boha. Farmer flexibility concerning future rotation planning is affected by the framing of climate predictions.. 2020. doi: 10.31220/agriRxiv.2020.00025
Muneta G. Manzeke-Kangara, Edward J.M. Joy, Florence Mtambanengwe, Prosper Chopera, Michael J. Watts, Martin R. Broadley, Paul Mapfum. Good soil management can reduce dietary zinc deficiency in Zimbabwe.. 2021. doi: 10.31220/agriRxiv.2021.00033
Inderpreet Dhaliwal, Gaurav Khosla, T. P. Singh, B. S. Gill, Prashant Kaushi. DUS characterization of some released varieties and advanced breeding lines of soybean ( Glycine max L.) under Punjab agroclimatic conditions.. 2020. doi: 10.31220/agriRxiv.2020.00015
-
ID Submit time Number Download -
Public Anonymous To author only
Get Citation
Article Metrics
- Read: 72
- Download: 0
- Comment: 0



