Prosper Kamusasa, Eddington Gororo, Fungayi Primrose Chatiz. Effect of whole and clarified egg yolk based extenders on post-thaw semen quality in bulls.. 2021. agriXiv.2021.00050
DOI:10.31220/agriRxiv.2021.00050
Effect of whole and clarified egg yolk based extenders on post-thaw semen quality in bulls.
-
Abstract: Abstract This study was conducted to evaluate the comparative cryoprotective effects of whole egg yolk and clarified egg yolk on post thaw sperm quality parameters and to determine the optimum clarified egg yolk inclusion level (10-20%) in semen extenders for Mashona bull semen cryopreservation. It was shown that there was a significant decrease in sperm quality variables following cryopreservation. Semen quality increased with the concentration of clarified egg yolk, indicating a positive relationship between egg yolk LDL concentration and maintenance of in vitro sperm quality. The 20% clarified egg yolk (CEY20) extender treatment gave post-thaw motility, viability and normal morphology values which were comparable to the control (20% whole egg yolk, WEY20). The 10% clarified egg yolk concentration gave the least post-thaw quality values and the greatest proportion of defective spermatozoa. This experiment found no advantage of replacing whole egg yolk with up to 15% clarified egg yolk in Mashona bull semen cryopreservation. However, 20% clarified and 20% whole egg yolk performed similarly in the maintenance of post-thaw sperm motility, viability and normal morphology.
Key words: egg yolk; clarified; 20; concentration; cryopreservation; pos提交时间:2021-01-01
版权声明:作者本人独立拥有该论文的版权,预印本系统仅拥有论文的永久保存权利。任何人未经允许不得重复使用。 -
图表
-
Giovanni Cafà, J. Miguel Bonnin, Nicola Holden, Jacob Malone, Tim H. Mauchline, Ian M. Clark, Rodrigo Gouvêa Taketani, Matthew J. Rya. Cryopreservation of a soil microbiome using a Stirling 1 cycle approach - a genomic assessment.. 2021. doi: 10.31220/agriRxiv.2021.00066
Gonzalo Cantalapiedra-Hijar, I. Morel, Bernard Sepchat, Céline Chantelauze, G A Miller, Carol-Anne Duthie, I. Ortigues-Marty, R.J. Dewhurs. Identifying cattle with superior growth feed efficiency through their natural 15 N abundance and plasma urea concentration: a meta-analysis.. 2021. doi: 10.31220/agriRxiv.2021.00107
Desislava Vlahova‐Vangelova, Desislav K. Balev, Nikolay Kolev, Margarita Terziyska, Stefan Dragoe. The effect of dietary dry distilled rose petals or dihydroquercetin supplementation on the oxidative stability and quality of lamb muscles and fat.. 2021. doi: 10.31220/agriRxiv.2021.00035
Tarun Kumar, K. K. Bhardwaj, Prashant Kaushi. Effect of soil properties and nutrient status on Eucalyptus tereticornis based agroforestry system in India.. 2020. doi: 10.31220/agriRxiv.2020.00008
Alan G. Buddie, Ivan Rwomushana, Lisa Offord, Simeon Kibet, Fernadis Makale, Djamila Djeddour, Giovanni Cafà, Koskei K. Vincent, Alexander Muvea, Duncan Chacha, Roger Da. First report of the invasive golden apple snail, Pomacea canaliculata in Kenya.. 2020. doi: 10.31220/agriRxiv.2020.00027
Dilini Abeygunawardane, Angela Kronenburg García, Zhanli Sun, Daniel Müller, Almeida Sitoe, Patrick Meyfroid. Resource frontiers and agglomeration economies: the varied logics of land-based investing in Southern and Eastern Africa.. 2020. doi: 10.31220/agriRxiv.2020.00024
M. Abdullah Shaikh, Michalis Hadjikakou, Brett A. Brya. Patterns and trends in national-level consumption and production-based utilisation of the land-system change planetary boundary.. 2020. doi: 10.31220/agriRxiv.2020.00002
Alfredo Júnior Paiola Albrecht, Leandro Paiola Albrecht, H.L. Villetti, Vinícius Gabriel Caneppele Pereira, Giovana Orso, Nour Eddine El-Gueddari, Bruno M. Moerschbacher, Roberta Pauler. Effect of chitosan foliar application on the performance and yield of soybean and maize under field conditions.. 2021. doi: 10.31220/agriRxiv.2022.00114
K. V. Daniel, Mark A. Bradford, Emma Fuller, Emily E. Oldfield, Stephen A. Woo. Soil organic matter effects on US maize production and crop insurance payouts under drought.. 2020. doi: 10.31220/agriRxiv.2020.00018
Suvita Rani, Shubham Singh, Sujit Bhattachary. What is the impact of India's plant variety protection act? An analytical examination based on registrations under this act.. 2020. doi: 10.31220/agriRxiv.2020.00004
-
序号 提交日期 编号 操作 1 2021-01-01 10.31220/agriRxiv.2021.00050V1
下载 -
-
公开评论 匿名评论 仅发给作者
引用格式
访问统计
- 阅读量:49
- 下载量: 0
- 评论数:0



