DOI: 10.31220/agriRxiv.2024.00245

•  

  Abstract: Abstract CONTEXT: Farm size is a key indicator associated with the environmental, economic, and social contexts and outcomes of agriculture. Farm size data is typically obtained from agricultural censuses or household surveys, but both are usually only available in infrequent time intervals and at aggregate spatial scales. In contrast, spatially explicit and detailed data on individual fields can be continuously derived from Earth observation data. Assuming a field size to farm size relationship (FFR) exists, assessing field sizes and their changes over time using Earth observation could enhance our understanding of the spatial patterns and dynamics of farm size. However, current empirical knowledge does not allow characterizing this FFR over large spatial extents. OBJECTIVE: To address this knowledge gap, we here provide a quantitative assessment of the FFR using Germany as a case study. METHODS: We developed a Bayesian multilevel model and a machine learning model to estimate farm size based on field size, controlling for a set of contextual factors such as crop types, topography, and neighborhood effects. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: We found that farm size generally increased with field size for almost all federal states and crop type groups, but the FFR varied considerably in magnitude. Farm size predictions were accurate for medium sized and large farms (50-7,000 ha, representing 66% of the data) with mean absolute percentage errors of 40-114% but estimates for smaller farms had higher errors. Spatially aggregating predictions to 15 km diameter hexagons resulted in more accurate predictions (mean absolute percentage errors of 37%) compared to the field-level. SIGNIFICANCE: Our study presents the first empirical insights into the FFR, opening future research directions towards producing spatially explicit farm size predictions at scale. Such information is key for monitoring scale transitions in agricultural systems, facilitating the design of timely and targeted interventions, and avoiding undesired outcomes of such processes.

  Key words: farm size; field size; ffr; predictions; estimate; the fiel

  Submit time: 24 April 2024

  Copyright: The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted agriXiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.
• html

• 图表

• Robert L. Crabtree, Dean Koch, Subhash R. Lel. Misleading overestimation bias in methods to estimate wolf abundance that use spatial models.. 2023. doi: 10.31220/agriRxiv.2023.00215

  Cristina Chiarella, Patrick Meyfroidt, Dilini Abeygunawardane, Piero Confort. Balancing the trade-offs between land productivity, labor productivity and labor intensity.. 2022. doi: 10.31220/agriRxiv.2022.00137

  Wendy A. Ruscoe, Peter Brown, Lyn A. Hinds, Steve Henry, Nikki Van de Weyer, Freya Robinson, Kevin P. Oh, Richard P. Dunca. Improved house mouse control in the field with a higher dose zinc phosphide bait.. 2022. doi: 10.31220/agriRxiv.2022.00124

  John Fredy Ramírez-Agudelo, Carlos Santiago Escobar-Restrepo, Rafael Muñoz Tamayo, Sandra L. Posada-Ochoa, Ricardo Rosero-Noguer. Intake time as potential predictor of methane emissions from cattle.. 2022. doi: 10.31220/agriRxiv.2022.00134

  Rohit Raj Jha, Gopal Prasad Khanal, Kavita Isvara. Factors affecting crop field use by Blackbuck in Krishnasaar Conservation Area, Nepal.. 2021. doi: 10.31220/agriRxiv.2021.00098

  Nikee Shrestha, Anirudha Powadi, Jonathan M. Davis, Timilehin T. Ayanlade, Huyu Liu, Michael C. Tross, R. Mathivanan, John Bares, Lina Lopez-Corona, Jonathan Turkus, Lisa Coffey, Talukder Z. Jubery, Yufeng Ge, Asheesh K. Singh, James C. Schnable, Baskar Ganapathysubramanian, Patrick S. Schnabl. Plot-level satellite imagery can substitute for UAVs in assessing maize phenotypes across multistate field trials.. 2024. doi: 10.31220/agriRxiv.2024.00251

  Giovanni Cafà, J. Miguel Bonnin, Nicola Holden, Jacob Malone, Tim H. Mauchline, Ian M. Clark, Rodrigo Gouvêa Taketani, Matthew J. Rya. Cryopreservation of a soil microbiome using a Stirling 1 cycle approach - a genomic assessment.. 2021. doi: 10.31220/agriRxiv.2021.00066

  Nathan Morrow, Nancy B. Mock, Andrea Gatto, Andrea Colantoni, Luca Salvat. Farm forests, biomass poverty and chronic seasonal hunger.. 2021. doi: 10.31220/agriRxiv.2021.00104

  Samuel V.J. Robinson, Lan H. Nguyen, Paul Galper. Livin' on the edge: precision yield data shows evidence of ecosystem services from field boundaries.. 2021. doi: 10.31220/agriRxiv.2021.00089

  Simeon C. Bernado. Farm labor, non-farm activities, and poverty alleviation: an ethnography on how upland farmers meet farm demands and sustain household needs.. 2022. doi: 10.31220/agriRxiv.2022.00128

• ID

  Submit time

  Number

  Download

• Public  Anonymous  To author only Submit Comments