Livin' on the edge: precision yield data shows evidence of ecosystem services from field boundaries.

DOI: 10.31220/agriRxiv.2021.00089
Statement: This article is a preprint and has not been peer-reviewed. It reports new research that has yet to be evaluated and so should not be used to guide clinical practice.
  •  

    Abstract: Abstract Field boundaries can provide ecosystem services to crops by creating better abiotic conditions for crop growth, and can also act as habitat for beneficial arthropods. This suggests that crop boundaries may create an intermediate hump-shaped increase in crop yield, where negative edge effects are cancelled out by increased ecosystem services from the field boundary. However, there is little large-scale evidence showing this, largely because plot-scale crop yields are costly and time-consuming to measure. Precision yield data from combine yield monitors has huge potential in this respect, as the equipment is widespread and data is frequently recorded by growers. In this study, we used 252 field-years of yield monitor data from three common crops - wheat ( Triticum aestivum ), canola ( Brassica napus ), or peas ( Pisum sativum ) - recorded across Alberta, Canada, and examined how yield varied with distances from common crop boundary types. Average crop yield tended to increase with distance from crop boundaries before plateauing at about 50 m, and yield variation (SD) tended to decrease with distance. There was evidence of an intermediate increase in yield for wheat away from shelterbelts, and a weak increase in canola, but this was not seen for other crop types or boundary types. This study represents one of the first uses of precision yield data to measure ecosystem service provision at large spatial scales.

    Key words: increase; precision; yield data; crop; boundary; ecosystem service

    Submit time: 1 January 2021

    Copyright: The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted agriXiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.
  • 图表

  • Guoxian Liang, Lufeng Zhao, Junlong Ye, Zijun Ji, Jianjun Tang, Ke-yu Bai, Si-Jun Zheng, Liangliang Hu, Xin Che. Using aquatic animals as partners to increase yield and soil nitrogen in the paddy ecosystem.. 2021. doi: 10.31220/agriRxiv.2021.00086

    Rohit Raj Jha, Gopal Prasad Khanal, Kavita Isvara. Factors affecting crop field use by Blackbuck in Krishnasaar Conservation Area, Nepal.. 2021. doi: 10.31220/agriRxiv.2021.00098

    Bryony Taylor, Jonathan Paul Casey, Sivapragasam Annamalai, Elizabeth A. Finch, Tim Beale, W. Holland, Sean T. Murphy, Cambria Finegol. Minimizing pest and disease risks in uncertain climates: CABI initiatives developing new technologies and tools for outreaching early warning to farmers.. 2021. doi: 10.31220/agriRxiv.2021.00064

    Viviane Costa Silva, Mateus Silva Rocha, Gláucia Amorim Faria, Sílvio Fernando Alves Xavier, Tiago Almeida de Oliveira, Ana Patrícia Bastos Peixot. Boosting algorithms for prediction in agriculture: an application of feature importance and feature selection boosting algorithms for prediction crop damage.. 2021. doi: 10.31220/agriRxiv.2021.00092

    Anna Rini, N. Hemalatha, Raji Sukuma. Decision tree classification of digital soil, weather, crop mapping and yield prediction using linear regression with region influences.. 2021. doi: 10.31220/agriRxiv.2021.00072

    K. V. Daniel, Mark A. Bradford, Emma Fuller, Emily E. Oldfield, Stephen A. Woo. Soil organic matter effects on US maize production and crop insurance payouts under drought.. 2020. doi: 10.31220/agriRxiv.2020.00018

    Alfredo Júnior Paiola Albrecht, Leandro Paiola Albrecht, H.L. Villetti, Vinícius Gabriel Caneppele Pereira, Giovana Orso, Nour Eddine El-Gueddari, Bruno M. Moerschbacher, Roberta Pauler. Effect of chitosan foliar application on the performance and yield of soybean and maize under field conditions.. 2021. doi: 10.31220/agriRxiv.2022.00114

    Santosh Kalaun. Correlation and path coefficient analysis of seed yield and yield components of French bean ( Phaseolus vulgaris L.) genotypes in sub-tropical region.. 2020. doi: 10.31220/agriRxiv.2020.00001

    Munir Zia, A. Lodhi, Muhammad Zahid Aziz, Aftab Naseem, Waqar Ahmad, R. Murray Lark, Michael J. Watts, Martin R. Broadley, E.L. Ande. Soil fertility mapping and agronomic advice at the regional scale using private sector data.. 2021. doi: 10.31220/agriRxiv.2021.00113

    Moritz Laub, Lisa Pataczek, Arndt Feuerbacher, Sabine Zikeli, Petra Hög. Contrasting yield responses at varying levels of shade suggest different suitability of crops for dual land-use systems. A meta-analysis.. 2021. doi: 10.31220/agriRxiv.2021.00099

  • ID Submit time Number Download
    1 2021-01-01

    10.31220/agriRxiv.2021.00089V1

    Download
  • Public  Anonymous  To author only

Get Citation

Samuel V.J. Robinson, Lan H. Nguyen, Paul Galper. Livin' on the edge: precision yield data shows evidence of ecosystem services from field boundaries.. 2021. agriXiv.2021.00089

Article Metrics

  • Read: 64
  • Download: 0
  • Comment: 0

Email This Article

User name:
Email:*请输入正确邮箱
Code:*验证码错误