Contrasting yield responses at varying levels of shade suggest different suitability of crops for dual land-use systems. A meta-analysis.

DOI: 10.31220/agriRxiv.2021.00099
Statement: This article is a preprint and has not been peer-reviewed. It reports new research that has yet to be evaluated and so should not be used to guide clinical practice.
  •  

    Abstract: Abstract Despite the large body of research studying crop growth parameters, there is still a lack of systematic assessments on how harvestable yields of different crop types respond to varying levels of shading. However, with the advent of agrivoltaic (AV) systems, a technology that combines energy and food production, and the new focus on agroforestry (AF), shade tolerance is becoming an important parameter for crop production systems. To address this research gap, a meta-analysis with data from two experimental approaches (intercropping and artificial shading with cloths, nets or solar panels) was performed to quantitatively assess the susceptibility of different temperate crop types to increasing levels of shading. Crop type specific yield response curves were estimated as a function of reduction in solar radiation (RSR), by estimating relative crop yields compared to the unshaded controls. Only studies that reported RSR and crop yield per area in temperate and subtropical areas were included. Using a random slope effect for each study, the specific variance components were accounted for. The results suggested a nonlinear relationship between achieved crop yields and RSR for all crop types. Most crops tolerate RSR up to 15%, showing a less than proportionate yield decline. However, significant differences between the response curves of different crop types existed: Berries, fruits and fruity vegetables benefited from shading up to RSR of 30%. Forages, leafy vegetables, tubers/root crops and C3 cereals showed initially less than proportionate crop yield loss. In contrast, maize and grain legumes experienced strong crop yield losses even at low RSR levels. The results provide first indicators for differences in crop type suitability to shading, and thus for AV and AF systems. Detailed yield response curves, as provided in this study, are valuable tools to optimize the output of annual crop components in AV and AF systems.

    Key words: rsr; crop types; shading; av; af system; a meta-analysi

    Submit time: 1 January 2021

    Copyright: The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted agriXiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.
  • 图表

  • Olef Koch, Pierre L. Ibisch, Ralf Bloc. Climate change and shifting land-use: consequences for smallholder agroforestry systems and rural livelihoods in the southwest Ethiopian Highlands.. 2021. doi: 10.31220/agriRxiv.2021.00077

    Paul Melloy, Emerson M. Del Ponte, Adam H. Spark. Timing of triazole-based spray schedules for controlling mungbean powdery mildew in Australia: a meta-analysis.. 2021. doi: 10.31220/agriRxiv.2021.00042

    Pietro Previtali, Filippo Giorgini, Randall Mullen, Nick K. Dookozlian, Kerry L. Wilkinson, Christopher M. For. A systematic review and meta-analysis of vineyard techniques used to delay ripening.. 2021. doi: 10.31220/agriRxiv.2021.00112

    Gonzalo Cantalapiedra-Hijar, I. Morel, Bernard Sepchat, Céline Chantelauze, G A Miller, Carol-Anne Duthie, I. Ortigues-Marty, R.J. Dewhurs. Identifying cattle with superior growth feed efficiency through their natural 15 N abundance and plasma urea concentration: a meta-analysis.. 2021. doi: 10.31220/agriRxiv.2021.00107

    Eduardo Oliveira, Patrick Meyfroid. Strategic land-use planning instruments in tropical regions: state of the art and future research.. 2021. doi: 10.31220/agriRxiv.2021.00052

    Rohit Raj Jha, Gopal Prasad Khanal, Kavita Isvara. Factors affecting crop field use by Blackbuck in Krishnasaar Conservation Area, Nepal.. 2021. doi: 10.31220/agriRxiv.2021.00098

    María‐Soledad Benítez, Patrick M. Ewing, Shannon L. Osborne, R. Michael Lehma. Rhizosphere microbial communities explain positive effects of diverse crop rotations on corn and soybean performance: microbiome explain benefits of diverse rotations.. 2020. doi: 10.31220/agriRxiv.2020.00023

    K. V. Daniel, Mark A. Bradford, Emma Fuller, Emily E. Oldfield, Stephen A. Woo. Soil organic matter effects on US maize production and crop insurance payouts under drought.. 2020. doi: 10.31220/agriRxiv.2020.00018

    M. Abdullah Shaikh, Michalis Hadjikakou, Brett A. Brya. Patterns and trends in national-level consumption and production-based utilisation of the land-system change planetary boundary.. 2020. doi: 10.31220/agriRxiv.2020.00002

    Aida Safina Aridi, Ling ChinNyuk, Nur Akmal Ishak, M. Y. Nor Nadiah, Mohammad Faisal Ahmed, Yus Aniza Yuso. Structural FTIR analysis of cellulose functional groups isolated from Leucaena leucocephala pods using different bleaching agents.. 2020. doi: 10.31220/agriRxiv.2020.00026

  • ID Submit time Number Download
    1 2021-01-01

    10.31220/agriRxiv.2021.00099V1

    Download
  • Public  Anonymous  To author only

Get Citation

Moritz Laub, Lisa Pataczek, Arndt Feuerbacher, Sabine Zikeli, Petra Hög. Contrasting yield responses at varying levels of shade suggest different suitability of crops for dual land-use systems. A meta-analysis.. 2021. agriXiv.2021.00099

Article Metrics

  • Read: 69
  • Download: 0
  • Comment: 0

Email This Article

User name:
Email:*请输入正确邮箱
Code:*验证码错误