Biofortification in wheat: research progress, potential impact, and policy imperatives.

DOI: 10.31220/agriRxiv.2022.00140
Statement: This article is a preprint and has not been peer-reviewed. It reports new research that has yet to be evaluated and so should not be used to guide clinical practice.
  •  

    Abstract: Abstract Biofortification is a promising strategy to reduce the persisting micronutrient deficiency. Biofortifying wheat grains has the potential to alleviate malnutrition as it is one of the major staple crops. In this study, we examine the research progress and impact of agronomic and genetic efforts on wheat biofortification. Developing countries like India, Pakistan, and China lead the research in wheat biofortification, followed by Turkey, Australia, the United Kingdom, and the United States of America. Using meta-analysis we find that agronomic biofortification leads to a 1.6 standard deviation (SD) and 1.7 SD increase in zinc (Zn) and iron (Fe) concentration, respectively. Genetic biofortification efforts lead to a 74% and 79% increase in Zn and Fe contents, respectively. The effects of biofortification were larger in Asia and Africa, where micronutrient deficiency and hidden hunger are widespread. In India, genetic biofortification has more potential than agronomic biofortification as the impact of the former on wheat micronutrient concentration was around three times higher than the latter. Further, genetic biofortification has been recognized as an economical and sustainable strategy. India's first biofortified wheat variety (WB 02), since its release, is cultivated in around 144,256 hectares generating an estimated economic surplus of ? 50.54 million at the constant price (base year as 2011-12). We propose policy inputs to strengthen the value chain on biofortification, followed by a framework to upscale the adoption of biofortified wheat varieties to combat hunger and improve its effect on nutritional outcomes.

    Key words: biofortification; wheat; genetic biofortification; india; followed by; polic

    Submit time: 1 January 2022

    Copyright: The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted agriXiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.
  • 图表

  • R. Sendhil, Joan Nyika, Sheel Yadav, Joby Mackolil, Prashat G. Rama Prashat, Endashaw Workie, Raja Ragupathy, P. Ramasundara. Consumer perception and preference towards genetically modified (GM) foods: bibliometric evidence and policy imperatives.. 2021. doi: 10.31220/agriRxiv.2021.00061

    Cristina Caldelas, Fatima Zahra Rezzouk, Nieves Aparicio, José Luís Arau. Cultivar diversity in the mineral content of wheat grain under different nitrogen regimes.. 2022. doi: 10.31220/agriRxiv.2022.00123

    Suvita Rani, Shubham Singh, Sujit Bhattachary. What is the impact of India's plant variety protection act? An analytical examination based on registrations under this act.. 2020. doi: 10.31220/agriRxiv.2020.00004

    Babar Hussain, Bala Anı Akpınar, Michaël Alaux, A. M. Algharib, Deepmala Sehgal, Zulfiqar Ali, R. Appels, G. I. Aradottir, Jacqueline Batley, Arnaud Bellec, Alison R. Bentley, H Busra Cagirici, L. Cattivelli, Frédéric Choulet, James Cockram, Flora Desiderio, Pierre Devaux, Münevver Doğramacı, Gabriel Dorado, Susanne Dreisigacker, Dave Edwards, K. El-Hassouni, Kellye Eversole, Tzion Fahima, Melania Figueroa, Sergio Gálvez, Kulvinder S. Gill, Liubov Govta, Alvina Gul, Goetz Hensel, Pilar Hernández, L. C. Herrera, Amir M. H. Ibrahim, Benjamin Kilian, Viktor Korzun, Tamar Krugman, Yinghui Li, Shuyu Liu, Amer F. Mahmoud, Alexey Morgounov, Tuğdem Muslu, Faiza Naseer, Frank Ordon, Etienne Paux, Dragan Perović, Gadi V. P. Reddy, Jochen C. Reif, Matthew Reynolds, Rajib Roychowdhury, Jackie C. Rudd, Taner Z. Sen, Sivakumar Sukumaran, Vijay K. Tiwari, Naimat Ullah, Turgay Ünver, Selami Yazar, Hikmet Buda. Wheat genomics and breeding: bridging the gap.. 2021. doi: 10.31220/agriRxiv.2021.00039

    Yaswant Kumar Pankaj, Rajeev Kumar, Lily Pal, Ragupati Nagarajan, Kulvinder S. Gill, Vishal Kumar, Sourav Panigrah. Performance and yield stability of doubled haploid population of wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.) under high temperature regime.. 2021. doi: 10.31220/agriRxiv.2021.00088

    Rajeev Kumar, Bimlendra Kumari, Shikha Yashveer, Prashant Kaushi. Assessment of genetic diversity among poplar ( Populus deltoides Marsh.) clones from India using RAPD markers.. 2020. doi: 10.31220/agriRxiv.2020.00014

    Maria Pía Alonso, Maria Pía Alonso, Ana Clara Pontarol. Selection for high spike fertility index in early generations increases grain number per unit area (and yield) of advanced breeding lines in bread wheat.. 2022. doi: 10.31220/agriRxiv.2022.00127

    Joanna Banach, Katarzyna Majewska, Małgorzata Grzywińska‐Rąpca, Krystyna Żuk‐Gołaszewsk. The use of a non-invasive electrical method to assess the chemical composition, hardness, and color of durum wheat grain cultivated in an integrated system.. 2021. doi: 10.31220/agriRxiv.2021.00087

    Richa Rajput, A. Arunachala. Plant residue quality index and ecological potential approach for selective reincorporation of crop residues in soil.. 2022. doi: 10.31220/agriRxiv.2022.00122

    Karthik Muthineni, Akhil Yalagonda, Praveen Gorla, Tarun Pullur. Implementation of automated motor starter unit for smart farming in India.. 2020. doi: 10.31220/agriRxiv.2020.00009

  • ID Submit time Number Download
  • Public  Anonymous  To author only

Get Citation

R. Sendhil, A G Adeeth Cariappa, P. Ramasundaram, Vikas Gupta, Gopalareddy Krishnappa, O. P. Gupta, Anuj Kumar, S. V. Singh, Gurbachan Sing. Biofortification in wheat: research progress, potential impact, and policy imperatives.. 2022. agriXiv.2022.00140

Article Metrics

  • Read: 73
  • Download: 0
  • Comment: 0

Email This Article

User name:
Email:*请输入正确邮箱
Code:*验证码错误