Suvita Rani, Shubham Singh, Sujit Bhattachary. What is the impact of India's plant variety protection act? An analytical examination based on registrations under this act.. 2020. agriXiv.2020.00004
What is the impact of India's plant variety protection act? An analytical examination based on registrations under this act.
DOI: 10.31220/agriRxiv.2020.00004
-
Abstract: Abstract Agriculture plays an important role in the Indian Economy with India's population largely dependent on agriculture. Mandated by TRIPS for providing protection for plant varieties, India has constructed a sui generis system for protection of plant variety, 'The Protection of Plant Variety and Farmers Right Act, 2001 (PPV&FR Act)'. This act draws from UPOV 1978 as well as UPOV 1991, and incorporates some unique provisions keeping in view the challenges and constraints of the Indian agriculture ecosystem. As per the PPV&FR act, a registration system has been created for registering plant varieties under various categories. The primary objective of the paper is to examine what has been the impact of the PPV&FR Act. The paper addresses this objective by critically examining the registrations under this act. Does this act provide an incentive mechanism for different stakeholders to register their plant varieties? What does the registration indicate: in terms of types of crops being registered, the trend of registration under different categories, the stakeholder's involvement, and whether it is contributing towards stimulating innovation across the crop development ecosystem. These are some of the issues that the paper examines to assess the impact of India's PPV&FR Act.
Key words: amp; india; fr; ppv; the impact; the papeSubmit time: 1 January 2020
Copyright: The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted agriXiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. -
图表
-
Karthik Muthineni, Akhil Yalagonda, Praveen Gorla, Tarun Pullur. Implementation of automated motor starter unit for smart farming in India.. 2020. doi: 10.31220/agriRxiv.2020.00009
Tarun Kumar, K. K. Bhardwaj, Prashant Kaushi. Effect of soil properties and nutrient status on Eucalyptus tereticornis based agroforestry system in India.. 2020. doi: 10.31220/agriRxiv.2020.00008
N.Z. Stancheva, J. Nakev, Desislava Vlahova‐Vangelova, Desislav Balev, Stefan Dragoe. Impact of Siberian larch dihydroquercetin or dry distilled rose petals as feed supplements on 8 lamb's growth performance, carcass characteristics and blood count parameters.. 2020. doi: 10.31220/agriRxiv.2020.00006
M. Abdullah Shaikh, Michalis Hadjikakou, Brett A. Brya. Patterns and trends in national-level consumption and production-based utilisation of the land-system change planetary boundary.. 2020. doi: 10.31220/agriRxiv.2020.00002
Rajeev Kumar, Bimlendra Kumari, Shikha Yashveer, Prashant Kaushi. Assessment of genetic diversity among poplar ( Populus deltoides Marsh.) clones from India using RAPD markers.. 2020. doi: 10.31220/agriRxiv.2020.00014
Inderpreet Dhaliwal, Gaurav Khosla, T. P. Singh, B. S. Gill, Prashant Kaushi. DUS characterization of some released varieties and advanced breeding lines of soybean ( Glycine max L.) under Punjab agroclimatic conditions.. 2020. doi: 10.31220/agriRxiv.2020.00015
Todd S. Rosenstock, M. Mayzelle, Nictor Namoi, Peter Fantk. Climate impacts of natural farming: A cradle to gate comparison between conventional practice and Andhra Pradesh Community Natural Farming.. 2020. doi: 10.31220/agriRxiv.2020.00013
K. V. Daniel, Mark A. Bradford, Emma Fuller, Emily E. Oldfield, Stephen A. Woo. Soil organic matter effects on US maize production and crop insurance payouts under drought.. 2020. doi: 10.31220/agriRxiv.2020.00018
Willis Ochilo, G. Nyamasyo, J. Agan. Within-plant distribution and binomial sequential sampling plan for Tetranychus evansi (Acari: Tetranychidae) in greenhouse tomato: implications for management.. 2020. doi: 10.31220/agriRxiv.2020.00011
Marino Villavicencio, L. Schuller, Francisco Espinosa, Carlos Noceda, Daynet Sosa, Simón Pérez-Martíne. Foliar endophytic fungi of Theobroma cacao stimulate more than inhibit Moniliophthora spp. growth and behave more as an endophytes than pathogens.. 2020. doi: 10.31220/agriRxiv.2020.00019
-
ID Submit time Number Download -
Public Anonymous To author only
Get Citation
Article Metrics
- Read: 68
- Download: 0
- Comment: 0



