Sample frequency and reactivity of farmers influences correct insemination window on farms using on-farm milk progesterone for fertility management.

DOI: 10.31220/agriRxiv.2022.00133
Statement: This article is a preprint and has not been peer-reviewed. It reports new research that has yet to be evaluated and so should not be used to guide clinical practice.
  •  

    Abstract: Abstract Improving fertility of dairy cows on farm remains difficult, as it is a complex trait which depends on physiological, management and external factors. Even small improvements in fertility (e.g. in terms of conception rate) potentially make a big difference for cow longevity, lifetime production and as such, sustainability. The availability of 1) new sensor data to get a better grip on physiological status of cows and 2) new systems to accurately predict the best insemination window based on milk progesterone (P4), offers new opportunities to analyse and understand fertility performance, and subsequently improve this trait. Before external and physiological factors that impact conception success can be investigated, it is crucial that we have certainty on whether the correct insemination time was applied. This study uses an extensive dataset from 5 modern dairy farms with a Herd Navigator system (HN), which farmers use to determine the optimal moment of insemination upon a drop in milk P4 preceding luteolysis. Despite that in many cases the estimation of the insemination moment goes well, inconsistencies in detection of luteolysis arise when sampling rate or milking frequency deviate from optimal conditions, which subsequently impacts fertility performance. More specifically, the use of an algorithm for which a time lag is introduced that depends on both absolute P4 concentration, rate of change of P4 during luteolysis and a fixed threshold, leads to inconsistencies in detection of luteolysis when sampling rate or milking frequency deviate. In this study, we analysed the factors influencing correct identification of the insemination window, to better separate cases in which conception failed due to human or system errors and cases in which the cow physiology caused poor fertility performance. To this end, we analysed different traits related to insemination and sampling frequency of the Herd Navigator and looked at their effect on success of conception across the 5 farms. We found that, in farms with worse fertility performance, the time between the HN alarm and the true luteolysis (i.e. the first raw P4 measurement below 5 ng/mL) was greater and less consistent. When this time was used to distinct between high- and low P4 sampling rate cycles, successful insemination that followed a low P4 sampling rate has significantly less time between an insemination and the preceding HN alarm compared to unsuccessful inseminations following a low P4 sampling rate. Moreover, successful insemination that followed a low P4 sampling rate, are associated with less time between an insemination and the preceding HN alarm compared to successful inseminations that followed a high P4 sampling rate. These finding confirm that when the time between the HN alarm and the first raw P4 measurement below 5 ng/mL is greater, farmers should inseminate sooner. From this analysis, we can make a better selection of the cycles in which insemination time was correct, and thus depended on other factors. This is a first step towards improved understanding of fertility performance on farm, and as such, of a more sustainable dairy sector.

    Key words: p4; insemination; sampling rate; hn; fertility performance; luteolysi

    Submit time: 1 January 2022

    Copyright: The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted agriXiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.
  • 图表

  • Munir Zia, A. Lodhi, Muhammad Zahid Aziz, Aftab Naseem, Waqar Ahmad, R. Murray Lark, Michael J. Watts, Martin R. Broadley, E.L. Ande. Soil fertility mapping and agronomic advice at the regional scale using private sector data.. 2021. doi: 10.31220/agriRxiv.2021.00113

    Willis Ochilo, G. Nyamasyo, J. Agan. Within-plant distribution and binomial sequential sampling plan for Tetranychus evansi (Acari: Tetranychidae) in greenhouse tomato: implications for management.. 2020. doi: 10.31220/agriRxiv.2020.00011

    Maria Pía Alonso, Maria Pía Alonso, Ana Clara Pontarol. Selection for high spike fertility index in early generations increases grain number per unit area (and yield) of advanced breeding lines in bread wheat.. 2022. doi: 10.31220/agriRxiv.2022.00127

    Francesco Palumbo, G. Bee, Paolo Trevisi, Marion Girar. Decreasing the level of hemicelluloses in sow's lactation diet affects the milk composition and post-weaning performance of low birthweight piglets.. 2022. doi: 10.31220/agriRxiv.2022.00116

    Victor Bloch, Taru Palosuo, Hanna Huitu, Ari Ronkainen, Juha Backman, Katariina Pussi, Antti Suokannas, Matti Pastel. Towards a digital twin for optimal field management.. 2022. doi: 10.31220/agriRxiv.2022.00165

    Sergio Eduardo Contreras-Liza, Cristopher Villadeza Pardo, Pedro Rodriguez-Grados, Edison Palomares Anselmo, Carlos I. Arbiz. Yield and agronomic performance of sweet corn in response to inoculation with Azospirillum sp.. 2022. doi: 10.31220/agriRxiv.2022.00154

    María‐Soledad Benítez, Patrick M. Ewing, Shannon L. Osborne, R. Michael Lehma. Rhizosphere microbial communities explain positive effects of diverse crop rotations on corn and soybean performance: microbiome explain benefits of diverse rotations.. 2020. doi: 10.31220/agriRxiv.2020.00023

    Simeon C. Bernado. Farm labor, non-farm activities, and poverty alleviation: an ethnography on how upland farmers meet farm demands and sustain household needs.. 2022. doi: 10.31220/agriRxiv.2022.00128

    Ines Adriaens, W. Ouweltjes, Matti Pastell, C. Kamphui. Detecting dairy cows' lying behavior using noisy 3D ultra-wide band positioning data.. 2022. doi: 10.31220/agriRxiv.2022.00132

    Muneta G. Manzeke-Kangara, Edward J.M. Joy, Florence Mtambanengwe, Prosper Chopera, Michael J. Watts, Martin R. Broadley, Paul Mapfum. Good soil management can reduce dietary zinc deficiency in Zimbabwe.. 2021. doi: 10.31220/agriRxiv.2021.00033

  • ID Submit time Number Download
    1 2022-01-01

    10.31220/agriRxiv.2022.00133V1

    Download
  • Public  Anonymous  To author only

Get Citation

Dyan Meuwissen, Kim Brosens, Ben Aernouts, Ines Adriaen. Sample frequency and reactivity of farmers influences correct insemination window on farms using on-farm milk progesterone for fertility management.. 2022. agriXiv.2022.00133

Article Metrics

  • Read: 60
  • Download: 0
  • Comment: 0

Email This Article

User name:
Email:*请输入正确邮箱
Code:*验证码错误