DOI: 10.31220/agriRxiv.2022.00126

•  

  Abstract: Abstract As a subfield of artificial intelligence, machine learning designed to learn the structure of the data. Machine learning has been widely used in many scientific problems. In this study, we used machine learning techniques to figure out the most important physicochemical properties for type classification of red wines. We used a wines' dataset with 13 physicochemical properties. We used a Random Forest classifier to predict wine's type from its features, and permutation feature importance, in order to detect the most important properties of the wine for type classification. The properties: flavanoids, proline, and color intensity were found to be most important for type classification. Additional 4 classifiers: Laso classifier, Ridge classifier, Decision Tree classifier, and Support Vector classifier were used and examined for classification and feature importance. Flavanoids and proline were very important across all classifiers.

  Key words: type classification; flavanoids; machine learning techniques; classifiers; classifier; machine learnin

  Submit time: 1 January 2022

  Copyright: The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted agriXiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.
• html

• 图表

• Nuriel Shalom Mor, Tigabo Asras, Eli Gal, Tesfahon Demasia, Ezra Tarab, Nathaniel Ezekiel, Osher Nikapros, Oshri Semimufar, Eva Gladky, Maria Karpenko, Daniel Sason, Д. Н. Маслов, Omri Mo. Wine quality and type prediction from physicochemical properties using neural networks for machine learning: a free software for winemakers and customers.. 2022. doi: 10.31220/agriRxiv.2022.00125

  Diego A. Delgadillo-Duran, César Augusto Vargas-García, Viviana Marcela Varón-Ramírez, Francisco Calderón, Andrea C. Montenegro, Paula H. Reyes‐Herrer. Using vis-NIRS and machine learning methods to diagnose sugarcane soil chemical properties.. 2021. doi: 10.31220/agriRxiv.2020.00028

  Akhil Wilson, Raji Sukumar, N. Hemalath. Machine learning model for rice yield prediction using KNN regression.. 2021. doi: 10.31220/agriRxiv.2021.00070

  George Worrall, Jasmeet Judge, Kenneth J. Boote, Anand Rangaraja. In-season crop progress estimation using remote sensing and model-guided machine learning.. 2022. doi: 10.31220/agriRxiv.2022.00131

  P. Sukhetha, N. Hemalatha, Raji Sukuma. Classification of fruits and vegetables using ResNet model.. 2021. doi: 10.31220/agriRxiv.2021.00075

  Viviane Costa Silva, Mateus Silva Rocha, Gláucia Amorim Faria, Sílvio Fernando Alves Xavier, Tiago Almeida de Oliveira, Ana Patrícia Bastos Peixot. Boosting algorithms for prediction in agriculture: an application of feature importance and feature selection boosting algorithms for prediction crop damage.. 2021. doi: 10.31220/agriRxiv.2021.00092

  Anna Rini, N. Hemalatha, Raji Sukuma. Decision tree classification of digital soil, weather, crop mapping and yield prediction using linear regression with region influences.. 2021. doi: 10.31220/agriRxiv.2021.00072

  Ines Adriaens, W. Ouweltjes, Matti Pastell, C. Kamphui. Detecting dairy cows' lying behavior using noisy 3D ultra-wide band positioning data.. 2022. doi: 10.31220/agriRxiv.2022.00132

  Pietro Previtali, Filippo Giorgini, Randall Mullen, Nick K. Dookozlian, Kerry L. Wilkinson, Christopher M. For. A systematic review and meta-analysis of vineyard techniques used to delay ripening.. 2021. doi: 10.31220/agriRxiv.2021.00112

  Akhil Wilson, N. Hemalatha, Raji Sukuma. Computational prediction model for pepper yield prediction using support vector regression.. 2021. doi: 10.31220/agriRxiv.2021.00069

• ID	Submit time	Number	Download
  1	2022-01-01	10.31220/agriRxiv.2022.00126V1	Download

• Public  Anonymous  To author only Submit Comments