Ian Nicholas Best, Jhen Liu, Pei Jen L. Shaner, Chi‐Chien Kuo, Kurtis Jai‐Chyi Pe. Pest control practices of farmers in Taiwan and implications for non-target wildlife.. 2021. agriXiv.2021.00090
Pest control practices of farmers in Taiwan and implications for non-target wildlife.
DOI: 10.31220/agriRxiv.2021.00090
Statement: This article is a preprint and has not been peer-reviewed. It reports new research that has yet to be evaluated and so should not be used to guide clinical practice.
-
Abstract: Abstract Pests cause devastating losses on agricultural industries worldwide. Common pest management practices include using chemical products. The efficacy of these toxins remains inconclusive, however, and their application can have adverse effects on non-target wildlife from both direct and indirect exposure. In parts of Taiwan, threatened species may be at considerable risk since they inhabit areas with agricultural activity. Therefore, in this exploratory study, we surveyed farmers using a structured questionnaire in Miaoli County, northwestern Taiwan, in agricultural areas that overlap with the distribution of the locally endangered leopard cat ( Prionailurus bengalensis ), whose diet comprises a high proportion of rodents. Based on the completed questionnaires of 126 farmers, the majority stated they use at least two different types of chemical pest control products. Furthermore, pest-related factors, such as perceived worst pest, total pest problem, and number of pests, were all important determinants for pest control behavior. Farmers whose crops were afflicted by rodents were more likely to use rodenticides in addition to other types of pesticides. These agricultural areas, which include vegetable cropland, pose a risk of poisoning to non-target wildlife, like the leopard cat, through various exposure pathways including consumption of contaminated prey and dermal contact. Farmers also expressed support to use less chemical-based pest products, but not to stop using them entirely. Therefore, there may be opportunities to implement ecologically based control practices to mitigate risks to wildlife and promote increased environmental health.
Key words: farmers; pest; wildlife; taiwan; practices; targeSubmit time: 1 January 2021
Copyright: The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted agriXiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. -
图表
-
Bryony Taylor, Jonathan Paul Casey, Sivapragasam Annamalai, Elizabeth A. Finch, Tim Beale, W. Holland, Sean T. Murphy, Cambria Finegol. Minimizing pest and disease risks in uncertain climates: CABI initiatives developing new technologies and tools for outreaching early warning to farmers.. 2021. doi: 10.31220/agriRxiv.2021.00064
Daniel Paredes, Jay A. Rosenheim, Daniel S. Kar. The causes and consequences of pest population variability in agricultural landscapes.. 2021. doi: 10.31220/agriRxiv.2021.00084
Getaneh Sileshi, A. Zemedkun, S. Nurhussie. Assessment of the pesticide use, practice and hazards on cotton growing farmers in the Awash Valley Ethiopia.. 2021. doi: 10.31220/agriRxiv.2021.00044
Michelle Felton, Philip Jones, Richard Tranter, Joanna Clark, Tristan Quaife, Martin Luká. Farmers' attitudes towards, and intentions to adopt, agroforestry on farms in lowland South-East and East England.. 2021. doi: 10.31220/agriRxiv.2021.00110
Saba Baba Mohammed, Daniel Kwadjo Dzidzienyo, Muhammad Umar, Mohammad F. Ishiyaku, Pangirayi Tongoona, Vernon Grace. Appraisal of cowpea cropping systems and farmers' perceptions of production constraints and preferences in the dry savannah areas of Nigeria.. 2021. doi: 10.31220/agriRxiv.2021.00046
Poorva Joshi, Neelesh Dahanukar, Shankar Bharade, Vijay Dethe, Smita Dethe, Neha Bhandare, Milind Watv. Where honesty and hard work is the only stable strategy: design, evolution and pilot implementation of a support cum reward game in developmental economics.. 2020. doi: 10.31220/agriRxiv.2020.00007
Miranda Bane, Michael J. O. Pocock, Caroline Gibert, Matthieu Forster, Geoffroy Oudoire, Stéphane A. P. Derocles, David Boha. Farmer flexibility concerning future rotation planning is affected by the framing of climate predictions.. 2020. doi: 10.31220/agriRxiv.2020.00025
Ilce Gabriela Medina-Meza, Joshua VanderWeide, Cristóbal Torres-Palacios, Paolo Sabbatin. Quantitative metabolomics unveils the impact of agricultural practices in grape metabolome.. 2021. doi: 10.31220/agriRxiv.2021.00029
C. A. Rose Mary, A. Raji Sukumar, N. Hemalath. Text based smart answering system in agriculture using RNN.. 2021. doi: 10.31220/agriRxiv.2021.00071
Edward Martey, Peter Goldsmith, Prince Maxwell Etwir. Farmers' response to COVID-19 disruptions in the food systems in Ghana: the case of cropland allocation decision.. 2021. doi: 10.31220/agriRxiv.2021.00032
-
ID Submit time Number Download 1 2021-01-01 10.31220/agriRxiv.2021.00090V1
Download -
-
Public Anonymous To author only
Get Citation
Article Metrics
- Read: 65
- Download: 0
- Comment: 0
